Showing posts with label Bengal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bengal. Show all posts

Monday, February 27, 2012

Arunachal Pradesh belongs To india

      China has been claiming many Indian areas as its own the most funny case being Bengal included in China,as per its maps,some years ago!China is becoming bolder and bolder and the UPA especially is very meek.MM Singh claims that the two top Chinese leaders are his "friends",even as China humiliates India with frequent incursions,one occurring very recently as per the Indian Army.
      Now China as usual has opposed Anthony's visit to Arunachal Pradesh,as also the many visits of India's president etc...China refuses Visa to residents of Arunachal.
     THIS link proves that Arunachal Pradesh belongs to India.
THIS WIKIPEDIA LINK explains things in detail. An excerpt from the link above:-
"

Drawing of McMahon line


British map published in 1909 showing the Indo-Tibetan traditional border (eastern section on the top right)
In 1913-1914 representatives of China, Tibet and Britain negotiated a treaty in India: the Simla Accord.[7] This treaty's objective was to define the borders between Inner and Outer Tibet as well as between Outer Tibet and British India. British administrator, Sir Henry McMahon, drew up the 550 miles (890 km) McMahon Line as the border between British India and Outer Tibet during the Simla Conference. The Tibetan and British representatives at the conference agreed to the line, which ceded Tawang and other Tibetan areas to the British Empire. The Chinese representative had no problems with the border between British India and Outer Tibet, however on the issue of the border between Outer Tibet and Inner Tibet the talks broke down. Thus, the Chinese representative refused to accept the agreement and walked out.[citation needed] The Tibetan Government and British Government went ahead with the Simla Agreement and declared that the benefits of other articles of this treaty would not be bestowed on China as long as it stays out of the purview.[8] The Chinese position was that Tibet was not independent from China, so Tibet could not have independently signed treaties, and per the Anglo-Chinese (1906) and Anglo-Russian (1907) conventions, any such agreement was invalid without Chinese assent.[9]
Simla was initially rejected by the Government of India as incompatible with the 1907 Anglo-Russian Convention. However, this agreement (Anglo-Russian Convention) was renounced by Russia and Britain jointly in 1921. However, with the collapse of Chinese power in Tibet the line had no serious challenges as Tibet had signed the convention, therefore it was forgotten to the extent that no new maps were published until 1935, when civil service officer Olaf Caroe called attention to this issue. The Survey of India published a map showing the McMahon Line as the official boundary in 1937.[citation needed] In 1938, the British finally published the Simla Convention as a bilateral accord two decades after the Simla Conference; in 1938 the Survey of India published a detailed map showing Tawang as part of NEFA. In 1944 Britain established administrations in the area, from Dirang Dzong in the west to Walong in the east. Tibet, however, altered its position on the McMahon Line in late 1947 when the Tibetan government wrote a note presented to the newly independent Indian Ministry of External Affairs laying claims to the Tibetan district (Tawang) south of the McMahon Line.[10] The situation developed further as India became independent and the People's Republic of China was established in 1949. With the China poised to take over Tibet, India unilaterally declared the McMahon Line to be the boundary in November 1950, and forced the last remnants of Tibetan administration out of the Tawang area in 1951.[11][12] The PRC has never recognized the McMahon Line, and claims Tawang on behalf of Tibetans.[13] The 14th Dalai Lama, who led the Tibetan government from 1950 to 1959, was quoted in 2003 as saying that Tawang was "actually part of the Tibetan administration" before the Simla Accord.[14] He clarified his position in 2008, saying that as far as Tibet was concerned "Tawang is part of India".[14] According to the Dalai Lama, "In 1962 during the India-China war, the People's Liberation Army (PLA) already occupied all these areas (Arunachal Pradesh) but they announced a unilateral ceasefire and withdrew, accepting the current international boundary,[15]".
Besides, as early as 1917, The Government of China had also published the “Postal map of China”, published at Peking in 1917. "It shows the whole northern Boundary of India more or less according to the traditional Indian alignments"[16]."
To be continued......

Sunday, December 11, 2011

EVMs Should Be Banned

  The Developed nations,except the USA have discarded the EVMs.It so happened that in the 21st century a President was,EVEN, accused of "stealing Elections" [mis]using EVMs in the USA!
For a similar demand by AGP and BJP,prior to the 2011 Assam Assembly Elections, the Indira Congress party cited Tamil Nadu and Bengal poll results.
   The full news from "thevotingnews.com":-
Jun 13 2011

Opposition to raise Electronic Voting Machine issue | The Telegraph Calcutta


"The Oppo­si­tion has decided to raise the issue of using elec­tronic vot­ing machine (EVM) at the day­long 7th Regional Con­sul­ta­tion for Elec­toral Reforms here tomorrow. The regional con­sul­ta­tion, organ­ised by the Cen­tre and the Elec­tion Com­mis­sion on how to strengthen the elec­toral sys­tem, will be held at NEDFi House here.
The AGP and the BJP will make a strong case for its out­right abo­li­tion at a gath­er­ing which would include Union law min­is­ter Veer­appa Moily and chief elec­tion com­mis­sioner S.Y. Quraishi.
… AGP’s Arun Sarma … said they want the EVMs replaced as any­thing “man­made” can be “tam­pered with”.
In fact, we need a sep­a­rate dis­cus­sion on EVM as it has been dis­carded in devel­oped coun­tries. If the Con­gress can fore­cast who will be win­ning, we have rea­sons to believe some­thing is amiss vis-à-vis the EVM,” he said.
In the just-concluded Assem­bly polls, the Con­gress won 78 of the 126 seats.
The AIUDF got 18, AGP 10 and BJP five, trig­ger­ing alle­ga­tions about EVM tampering.
The Con­gress, on the other hand, dis­missed the alle­ga­tion by point­ing to the poll defeats of the rul­ing par­ties in Tamil Nadu and West Bengal.
Like Sarma, BJP pres­i­dent Ran­jit Dutta has also decided to seek the abo­li­tion of theEVM to “save” democ­racy. “But we have not received any invi­ta­tion so far,” Dutta said.
Full Arti­cle: Opp to raise EVM issue."
      The following from the above article is  relevant :-
"In the just-concluded Assem­bly polls, the Con­gress won 78 of the 126 seats.
The AIUDF got 18, AGP 10 and BJP five, trig­ger­ing alle­ga­tions about EVM tampering.
The Con­gress, on the other hand, dis­missed the alle­ga­tion by point­ing to the poll defeats of the rul­ing par­ties in Tamil Nadu and West Bengal."
      The answer of the Indira Congress party IS NOT CONVINCING, neither is IT CORRECT. The Indira Congress party,citing Tamil Nadu and Bengal results,can be cunning,as the following are what a shrewd person or party,would, consider:-
1.The stakes and PRIORITIES.Some PARTIES may have different priorities and may eye the Lok Sabha Elections.  
2.The locations
3. Manipulate results in such a way as to Avoid suspicions,of FOUL PLAY.
      If the results had been DIFFERENT, in the two states the EVMs would have been suspected. And no other party had any chance in these two States.
                                Hence there is a NEED for Using ONLY Ballot papers for Elections.The DEMAND is the USE of Ballot Papers,in 2012 Assembly and all subsequent Elections in India,and perhaps the USA too.
My Thanks are due to"thevotingnews.com" site,for this news-item.
To be continued....

Sunday, October 9, 2011

The US Mamata Bannerjee Similarities,in,prior to, during and after the Bengal Assembly Elections 2011?

Disclaimer:-
This article tries to present the facts without prejudice to any Religion,Individual and such,even  in its assumptions.The similarity may be a coincidence and no malaise or prejudice, is intended,as I consider all Indian Citizens to be my brothers and sisters.Thus CONVERSION TO CHRISTIANITY is viewed and MENTIONED,on the basis of NATIONAL SECURITY and NOT BIGOTRY .   
Indian Elections are notorious for fraud,despite claims to the contrary.Now,knowing who had ruled India for a longer period of time its is not difficult to know who the culprits are.Knowing this,an attempt is made as to the MAIN scenario in the Bengal Elections which saw the dethroning of the Indian Left in,what was considered long to be its bastions, Bengal and Kerala despite getting almost the same percentage of votes.
1.The Indian Left has connections with China and had with the erstwhile USSR.
2.A particular  "leader" of the Indira Congress party is reported to be PLANTED in India by both the erstwhile USSR and the Opus Dei.
3.The Late Shri Jyoti Bosu,was reported to be,of the opinion that this Leader becoming the PM of India does not have any harmful effects whatsoever.
4.The Indira Congress party and the Indian Left were of the same Coalition,in 2004,Lok Sabha elections,ostensibly,on the basis of being "SECULAR"!
5.The Coalition mentioned above,containing other parties as well,like the DMK "won" the Elections in 2004.
6.During this time,the choice of MM Singh,who had not been ELECTED to the Lok Sabha, as the PM of India saw the culmination of one of the greatest DECEPTIONs in the History of India.For the record it may be mentioned that MM Singh lost the only Lok Sabha elections he contested from Delhi in the 90s of the last Century.  
7.Now,in the International Arena,the situation was like this:-
i.The USA was constantly BULLYING India for her Nuclear test at Pokhran,in the 90s,after the BJP/NDA Coalition, won the Election,on the basis of its promise that it would make India Nulcear and would test a device if it came to power.India's Foreign Minister Shri Jaswant Singh was meeting Strobe Talbott  at various places in and around the World.The USA was also angry that India had done this without any one's knowledge not even the USA.Some embargoes/sanctions were imposed upon India,which India manged to overcome
ii.The erstwhile USSR had been "broken up" and the ever-aggressive,USA and the UK were bullying all and sundry who did not toe their lines,which included M/s Saddam Hussein,Muammer Qaddafi etc,and even Russia herself.They began to caution"either with us or against us",like the Spartan Mother who told her Soldier Son,on his leaving for war,while handing over the shield/weapons to him,"either with it or upon it".The so-called "rogue" Nuclear nations who had not signed the NPT,were also subjects of bullying[see item i above]
iii.Thus it was,that MM Singh,agreed to sign an "Indo-US Nuclear Deal" with the USA,without the Parliament approval.While MM Singh went on proving how dangerous he was for India and her Democratic Republic by bluffing all the while, the Indian Left was against the "deal",for ideological and genuine reasons as things were vague and India would be converted into a toothless Nulcear Tiger,by the USA,by cunning,which is what has happened now.There are also many drawbacks like India "NUKING HERSELF",the spread of Cancer in the areas near the Nuclear Installations whose proposed,capacities are very huge,a "Terrorist Attack" on these etc.In Jaitapur,the French are to provide the Nuclear reactors,which are UNPROVEN with NOT a single PLANT running at present,anywhere in the World including France itself.In fact,there are reports that the French are experiencing many problems.This is the height of contempt that MM Singh has shown Humanity in general,and Indians and their LIVES, in particular.Though the UPA I was in Coalition with the Indian left,MM Singh was following a blatant pro-US and capitalistic policy.In the initial stages he had a very high contempt for the Indian Labourers,who did not have any Social Security Contracts,but now a days he talks of "inclusive growth" though the rich Oligarchs are getting richer,and ALL others POORER due to the decreasing value of the Rupee,in REAL TERMS.
iv.Many of the pro-US-MNCs Bills were also not getting passed in the Parliament due to the Indian Left.
v.Thus the USA,the Master of the UPA sans the Indian Left,by now,had reasons to see that the Indian left was destroyed.Around this time,the staff-strength, of the US Embassies were becoming too big.It was well-known these were CIA,apart from the many MNCs,other NGOs and "Press",of the USA and the West etc.India had been sold to the USA by MM Singh.
vi.With the Indian Left,not supporting the so-called "Indo-US Nuclear Deal",MM Singh,had to tell Bush that the deal had FALLEN through!
                                   Photo From "newanalysisindia",14/8/2008

                                   Photo from businessbrunch.wordpress.com07092008
This was when the USA showed its real anger and showed MM Singh who the Master was! Henry Kissinger and Henry Paulson were dispatched to India who were openly BULLYING India,Paulson saying,repeatedly, "India has to sign the Deal",while Kissinger was very aggressive and said,"No country signs an agreement with a US President and goes back on it".Both of them met with the CPM CM of Bengal Buddhadev Battacharjee.After this some strange things began happening.
a.Buddhadev was supporting MM Singh and the USA.
b.In Singur and Nandigram many people were massacred by the Indian Left,a possible and probable, False Flag in the lines of Gladio.


       Suddenly Mamata Bannerjee and her Trinamul Congress party began to capture headlines as "defenders" of the weak.Was the IB helping by "buying" the Indian media?They won the Kolkatta Municipal  Polls,2010,and again the Bengal Assembly Elections in 2011.What a turnaround after the "Indo-US Nuclear Deal"[fiasco,as this is what made other things possible or necessary for the USA]!
   There are certain similarities with what the USA and Mamata do.
1.MM Singh remarked that the defeat of the Left in Bengal was "regime change",a phrase,very dear  to the US Leaders.
2.Mamata like,Obama,before the elections, wanted "change"[Poriborthon].
3.Mamata thanked both the Italian Woman and MM Singh,after the victory of the TMC.
4.She promised, "Minorities" will be cared for.Mamata pampers Muslims with panchayat Polls in view.This is a must for MM Singh and his Woman Boss.But the following sites present a different story of the majority Hindus in Bengal.
i.Hindu Samhati
ii.Hinduexistence
    Mamata Bannerjee is friendly with the Maoists,who have agreed for talks with her Govt in Bengal but not with other State Governments.Now in Karnataka,about a day back a Policeman was killed by Maoists.All Maoists activities are very strong MAINLY in non-Congress party and non-TMC-ruled States.Something fishy?.In 2008 an aged Hindu Religious leader was assassinated[reminds one of Gladio and CIA and hence the USA] by the Maoists[a false Flag like Gladio],belonging,reportedly to the Christian Community[It is also reported that the Maoists are supported by the Indian Church,the USA and many NGOs and volunteers who have connections with Christian Communities],and the ensuing Hindu emotional backlash against Christians,was exploited by the UPA,[of which Mamata Bannerjee's party was a member],in 2009 Lok Sabha polls,to brand the BJP and Hindus in general,as anti-Minority.JD snapped relations with the BJP,its ruling Coalition partner, in Odisha.Does one smell a rat?

    There is a report today[10/10/2011] that Christians are protesting the burning of a Church in Egypt.While I sympathize with all the victims,irrespective of their religions,can this be a False Flag like Gladio?To remind everyone,recently,the Pope was claiming that Christians are being persecuted through out the World.Do these two have a connection?
[Please google for:-
1.Spanish Inquisition
2.Goa Inquisitions
3.Attacks on the former Yugoslavia,Afghanistan,Iraq and Libya].
Visit THIS Site.
    Finally the anxiety,regarding the North East India,due to conversion to Christianity,as our National Security is involved.Christians in THREE Border States here,are more than 90% of the population.The conversions were done,reportedly, from the time of the Cold War,by the USA,UK and theVatican.Was Secession an idea by these three,as the USA was unhappy with India's Non-Aligned Stand?Were border areas chosen specifically,with this idea,in mind?If the National Security can be affected by Conversion to Christianity in the North East,can the same apply to Conversion in general,in other areas and even in other non-Christian countries,like Sudan?
   The matter becomes more serious when one is reminded of the illegal immigration of Foreigners in the North East,with China posing a very serious threat in Arunachal Pradesh and Sikkim..
Please google for "Conversion to Christianity in the North East India".
To be continued.......